Read the claim against the source

Claim
Participation increased by 19.6 percentage points, 2012-2018.
Constructed source passage
Participation increased by approximately 20 percentage points over the same period.
Agrees
Population, period, direction, scope, and cited location.
First difference: over-specified
The claim invents precision the source does not provide.
Reading a claim against the passage it cites A claim and its cited passage set one above the other. A panel lists what agrees; the one phrase that does not is boxed in both, and the failure is named as over-specification. One claim, read against its source Claim 2 of the specimen summary. THE CLAIM Participation increased by 19.6 percentage points between 2012 and 2018. (Hallam 2021, p. 94) THE PASSAGE IT CITES [FICTIONAL — CONSTRUCTED FOR THIS EXERCISE] “In Brackenford, participation increased by approximately 20 percentage points between 2012 and 2018.” Source B, p. 94 THESE AGREE Same population, same period, same direction, same scope. The work exists, the page is right, the passage is there. OVER-SPECIFIED Only the precision is invented. Everything else about it is right. A citation that resolves, at the right page, to a passage that exists — and the claim still fails.